tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5364673723029953824.post2416561915842252776..comments2024-02-29T08:53:47.385-06:00Comments on Fish Creek Monitor: The OrdinanceFish Creek Neighborhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11321914266332394403noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5364673723029953824.post-39539388863899334992013-02-05T19:46:27.717-06:002013-02-05T19:46:27.717-06:00First of all, GREAT blog post!
I just watched th...First of all, GREAT blog post! <br /><br />I just watched the streaming vid of the council meeting - a bit surprised by Parker's statement that before one drill bit goes through the gate, Chesapeake will be in compliance - BUT, it was outrageous that Gearhart had the audacity to treat the issue as something negotiable AND said that Chesapeake DENIES they are in violation. <br /><br />Parker was ineffective in that he did NOT challenge Gearheart's stance on the issue. And it was outrageous that ANY council member approved that permit, considering Chesapeake is in violation. <br /><br />In my opinion, Gearheart's appearance and statements at this hearing took the issue of Chesapeake in the Barnett Shale to another level. <br /><br />The rampant non-compliance, dishonesty, and sense of entitlement of this operator is UNCONSCIONABLE. <br />RRCreporterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01643125075027183413noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5364673723029953824.post-41234217000864399652013-02-05T14:19:18.298-06:002013-02-05T14:19:18.298-06:00...the section of the ordinance they tried to appl...<b>...the section of the ordinance they tried to apply to the citizens does not even contain specific language dealing with our case ~ specifically with revocations of waivers.</b> <br /><br />Good Grief!! There's a <b>BIG problem!!</b> Now, what is the City going to do or say about that? Westchester Neighborhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02680654681555827977noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5364673723029953824.post-43494170549207536012013-02-05T06:37:50.434-06:002013-02-05T06:37:50.434-06:00During the January 22nd public hearing a citizen p...During the January 22nd public hearing a citizen presented to the Arlington City Council [in good faith] a revoked waiver, bringing the required percentage below 70%, thus requiring a super majority vote. However, the City decided not accept it as it was one business day late. [Both the property owner and speaker that night coincidentally had car issues and were unable to get that waiver delivered by Friday, as Monday was a holiday.] <br /><br />City council then procedes to vote 5-3 to approve Chesapeake's request for a drill site zoning change overlooking the fact that Chesapeake has Numerous Outstanding Violations at multiple drill sites throughout our city. <br /><br />It is interesting how our City strictly enforces the ordinance with private citizens but that same ordinance is not enforced with the gas industry. <br /><br />We inquired about these waivers, and here is the reply we received back from the city: <br /><br />"A supermajority vote was not required. Section 7.01(B)(1)(a)(1) of the Gas Drilling and Production ordinance states “. . . [p]petitions in support or opposition to the setback distance reduction must be submitted to the City at least one (1) business day prior to the date of the City Council public hearing. In the event the public hearing is continued, additional petitions may be submitted until one (1) business day prior to the date at which the hearing is continued. . .” A petition was not submitted in accordance with this provision." <br /><br />Curiously, the section of the ordinance they tried to apply to the citizens does not even contain specific language dealing with our case ~ specifically with revocations of waivers. Fish Creek Neighborhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11321914266332394403noreply@blogger.com